5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.92%
Revenue decline while VALMT.HE shows 23.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.52%
Cost reduction while VALMT.HE shows 23.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 22.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.87%
Margin expansion while VALMT.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
Other expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.19%
Operating expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 3.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.64%
Total costs reduction while VALMT.HE shows 19.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.23%
Interest expense change of 9.23% while VALMT.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
9.61%
D&A growth while VALMT.HE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.54%
EBITDA growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 58.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.09%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 25.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.50%
Operating income growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 147.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.67%
Operating margin growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 100.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-80.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.94%
Pre-tax income decline while VALMT.HE shows 158.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.18%
Pre-tax margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 109.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.03%
Tax expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 160.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.93%
Net income decline while VALMT.HE shows 158.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.01%
Net margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 109.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 162.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
Diluted EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 162.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.25%
Share count increase while VALMT.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.25%
Diluted share change of 13.25% while VALMT.HE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.