5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.70%
Revenue decline while VALMT.HE shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
14.02%
Cost growth 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 25.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-52.50%
Gross profit decline while VALMT.HE shows 21.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-49.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.39%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-43.39%
Operating expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 15.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.58%
Total costs growth less than half of VALMT.HE's 24.15%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.88%
D&A reduction while VALMT.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.34%
EBITDA decline while VALMT.HE shows 11.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.23%
Operating income decline while VALMT.HE shows 24.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
54.76%
Other expenses growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.85%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 26.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.31%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x VALMT.HE's 1.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.44%
Tax expense growth while VALMT.HE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.12%
Net income growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 70.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.60%
Net margin growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 36.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.09%
EPS growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 72.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.09%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 72.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.