5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.21%
Revenue decline while VALMT.HE shows 28.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.46%
Cost reduction while VALMT.HE shows 29.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.22%
Gross profit growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 25.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.51%
Margin expansion while VALMT.HE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.25%
Other expenses growth less than half of VALMT.HE's 7600.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
20.25%
Similar operating expenses growth to VALMT.HE's 21.01%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
1.48%
Total costs growth less than half of VALMT.HE's 28.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.02%
D&A change of 101.02% while VALMT.HE maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
4.09%
EBITDA growth below 50% of VALMT.HE's 37.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.44%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 9.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-52.94%
Operating income decline while VALMT.HE shows 49.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.88%
Operating margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 16.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.92%
Other expenses growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-56.19%
Pre-tax income decline while VALMT.HE shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.20%
Pre-tax margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 16.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.30%
Tax expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.15%
Net income decline while VALMT.HE shows 56.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.03%
Net margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 21.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.30%
EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 55.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.30%
Diluted EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 55.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.86%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-8.86%
Diluted share reduction while VALMT.HE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.