5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.40%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.08%
Cost increase while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-5.00%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.61%
Margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 9.40% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.36%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.36%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.74%
Total costs growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.94%
D&A reduction while VALMT.HE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.29%
EBITDA decline while VALMT.HE shows 18.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.96%
EBITDA margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 30.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.02%
Operating income decline while VALMT.HE shows 27.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.64%
Operating margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 40.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.23%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-9.08%
Pre-tax income decline while VALMT.HE shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.71%
Pre-tax margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 38.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.26%
Tax expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 12.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.09%
Net income decline while VALMT.HE shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.72%
Net margin decline while VALMT.HE shows 43.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.33%
EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 31.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.33%
Diluted EPS decline while VALMT.HE shows 31.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.90%
Share count increase while VALMT.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.90%
Diluted share increase while VALMT.HE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.