5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.49%
Revenue decline while VALMT.HE shows 0.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.52%
Cost growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 0.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-7.01%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Other expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 88.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.76%
Operating expenses reduction while VALMT.HE shows 10.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.75%
Similar total costs growth to VALMT.HE's 2.06%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
100.00%
Interest expense growth while VALMT.HE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.77%
D&A growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 1.72%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
7.00%
EBITDA growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.66%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
81.29%
Other expenses change of 81.29% while VALMT.HE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
8.86%
Pre-tax income growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.40%
Pre-tax margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.42%
Tax expense reduction while VALMT.HE shows 42.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.43%
Net income growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.98%
Net margin growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
EPS growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.24%
Share count reduction below 50% of VALMT.HE's 0.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x VALMT.HE's 1.75%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.