5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.94%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.94%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is -3.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54600.00%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-269.78%
Operating expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 1.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-8.57%
Total costs reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
262.75%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.88%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
444.44%
EBITDA growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
455.23%
EBITDA margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-116.67%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -11.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-120.96%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -15.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
54.17%
Other expenses growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-2.78%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -30.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-4.81%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -27.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1500.00%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -34.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
10.53%
Net income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
8.75%
Net margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
12.50%
EPS growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
12.50%
Diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.