5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Growth of 0.45% versus flat Packaging & Containers revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Positive growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-327.01%
Operating expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 3.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
12.25%
Total costs change of 12.25% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.97%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.16%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-44.21%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is -15.19%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-44.46%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -15.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-106.06%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -23.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-106.03%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -24.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
14.29%
Other expenses growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-148.89%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -31.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-148.67%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -35.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-400.00%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -37.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-157.89%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -26.67%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-157.63%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -28.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-156.42%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -36.41%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-156.42%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -32.53%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.