5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.65%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is 4.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.65%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34500.00%
Other expenses change of 34500.00% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
8.29%
Operating expenses change of 8.29% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
8.29%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 3.99%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
158.06%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.79%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-37.66%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-35.30%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-169.57%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-172.20%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-40.00%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-270.97%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-277.44%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
100.00%
Tax expense change of 100.00% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-310.71%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-318.70%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-312.50%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-312.50%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.84%
Share count reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.84%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.