PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.94%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-4.97%
Cost reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -2.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-51.13%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is -2.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-42.55%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -2.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28500.00%
Other expenses change of 28500.00% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
95.89%
Operating expenses change of 95.89% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
18.44%
Total costs growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.22%
D&A change of 16.22% versus flat Packaging & Containers D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-829.17%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.82%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-957.19%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1553.85%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -7.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1844.22%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -7.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
6.25%
Other expenses growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-693.10%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -8.93%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-832.35%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -6.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-625.00%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-533.33%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -22.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-644.53%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -17.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-472.73%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -15.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-472.73%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -15.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
10.58%
Share count change of 10.58% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
10.58%
Diluted share change of 10.58% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.