5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.92%
Growth of 1.92% versus flat Packaging & Containers revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
2.09%
Cost growth of 2.09% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
1.44%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.47%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
672.73%
Other expenses change of 672.73% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
672.73%
Operating expenses change of 672.73% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
43.21%
Total costs change of 43.21% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
493.10%
Interest expense growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
3.57%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.22%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-71.64%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is 1.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-78.20%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-86.34%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-86.59%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-446.15%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 3.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-94.97%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-95.06%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-110.53%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-94.29%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-94.39%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-93.02%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-93.02%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-23.54%
Share count reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-23.54%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.