5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.32%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-3.07%
Cost reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-7.80%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-3.64%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.40%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-25.40%
Operating expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 2.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-8.51%
Total costs reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-12.79%
Interest expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-51.72%
D&A reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
4.48%
EBITDA change of 4.48% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
39.36%
EBITDA margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
86.36%
Operating income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
94.78%
Operating margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1.41%
Other expenses change of 1.41% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify control.
237.50%
Pre-tax income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
252.75%
Pre-tax margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-550.00%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
400.00%
Net income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
422.59%
Net margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
333.33%
EPS change of 333.33% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
333.33%
Diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
23.08%
Share count change of 23.08% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
23.08%
Diluted share change of 23.08% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.