5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.11%
Growth of 5.11% versus flat Packaging & Containers revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
3.88%
Cost growth of 3.88% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
8.69%
Growth of 8.69% versus flat Packaging & Containers gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
3.41%
Margin change of 3.41% versus flat Packaging & Containers margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.34%
Other expenses change of 22.34% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
22.34%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.64%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
7.55%
Total costs change of 7.55% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
62.67%
Interest expense growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
90.00%
D&A growth while Packaging & Containers reduces D&A. Peter Lynch would examine asset strategy.
6.43%
EBITDA change of 6.43% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1.26%
Margin change of 1.26% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-15.12%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-19.25%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-87.86%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-68.52%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-70.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
103.85%
Tax expense change of 103.85% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-80.00%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 1.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-80.97%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-84.62%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-84.62%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
30.00%
Share count change of 30.00% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
30.00%
Diluted share change of 30.00% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.