5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.10%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.82%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
2.15%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.67%. Guy Spier would scrutinize cost control weaknesses.
-6.19%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is 2.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-6.10%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.57%
Other expenses change of 1.57% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
1.57%
Operating expenses growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
2.01%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.36%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
49.37%
Interest expense change of 49.37% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
3.78%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.26%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-48.68%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is 3.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.07%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-33.22%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 4.66%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-33.15%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-35.53%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-57.75%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 10.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-57.70%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 3.90%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-54.05%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 7.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-59.09%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-59.05%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-66.67%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 1.92%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-66.67%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 1.92%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
22.73%
Share count change of 22.73% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
22.73%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.