5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.60%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
14.08%
Cost growth of 14.08% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
-59.67%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is -2.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-57.73%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.81%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-59.81%
Operating expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-3.46%
Total costs reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
72.03%
Interest expense change of 72.03% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
6.07%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.14%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
158.46%
EBITDA growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
56.19%
EBITDA margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
58.55%
Operating income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
66.19%
Operating margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-12.62%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -12.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
111.11%
Pre-tax income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
121.29%
Pre-tax margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-817.65%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -21.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
331.94%
Net income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
352.77%
Net margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
332.00%
EPS growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
332.00%
Diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.