PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.59%
Positive growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
-16.43%
Cost reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -1.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
179.92%
Growth of 179.92% versus flat Packaging & Containers gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
167.63%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.07%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
136.25%
Other expenses change of 136.25% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
136.25%
Operating expenses change of 136.25% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-1.35%
Total costs reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -0.93%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-14.29%
Interest expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -2.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-1.91%
D&A reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-1.71%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2.56%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
42.16%
Operating income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
35.92%
Margin change of 35.92% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-50.86%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 24.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
36.84%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
30.84%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.98%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
109.84%
Tax expense growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 29.32%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
-20.26%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -8.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-23.76%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -6.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-21.30%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -2.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-21.30%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -2.83%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.35%
Share count change of 1.35% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
1.35%
Diluted share change of 1.35% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.