5.46 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
1.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-277.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.80%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
17.76%
Cost growth of 17.76% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
-56.27%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is -4.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-55.01%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.80%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.09%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-32.09%
Operating expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
5.75%
Total costs change of 5.75% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-22.22%
Interest expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
86.47%
D&A change of 86.47% versus flat Packaging & Containers D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
41.05%
EBITDA change of 41.05% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.01%
EBITDA margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-80.35%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -8.74%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-79.79%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -7.12%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
36.25%
Other expenses change of 36.25% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-93.87%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -7.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-93.69%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -3.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-184.91%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-70.67%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -2.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-69.83%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-69.81%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-69.81%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2.89%
Share count reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-2.89%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.