5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.67%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-4.89%
Cost reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-4.16%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is 1.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
0.54%
Margin expansion 75-90% of Packaging & Containers median of 0.64%. John Neff would investigate improvement potential.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.05%
Other expenses change of 5.05% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
5.05%
Operating expenses growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-2.72%
Total costs reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-21.69%
Interest expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -2.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.06%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is 6.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-9.05%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 5.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.75%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 8.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.77%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 6.56%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
22.83%
Other expenses growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-18.10%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 8.53%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.09%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
527.27%
Tax expense growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 8.59%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
-51.01%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-48.60%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -2.69%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-46.67%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-46.67%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.98%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-8.14%
Share count reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-8.14%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -0.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.