5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.04%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
9.63%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.70%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-8.38%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is 1.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-11.94%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-2.95%
Operating expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 1.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
6.22%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.32%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-14.08%
Interest expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
35.46%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.87%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
3.81%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.50%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-0.22%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 2.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-22.90%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-25.89%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
24.44%
Other expenses growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-22.35%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 1.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-25.37%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 2.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-47.83%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -4.93%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-19.83%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is 6.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-22.94%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 4.93%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-16.67%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 6.19%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-16.67%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is 6.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3.79%
Share count reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-3.79%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.