5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.70%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
14.02%
Cost growth of 14.02% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
-52.50%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-49.63%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -3.15%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.39%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-43.39%
Operating expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.58%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.05%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-4.88%
D&A reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-6.34%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.67%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.67%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.23%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -6.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-4.80%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -5.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
54.76%
Other expenses change of 54.76% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify control.
6.85%
Pre-tax income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
13.31%
Pre-tax margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
4.44%
Tax expense growth while Packaging & Containers reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
7.12%
Income change of 7.12% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
13.60%
Margin change of 13.60% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
9.09%
EPS change of 9.09% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
9.09%
Diluted EPS change of 9.09% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.