5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.60%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-3.37%
Cost reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-4.22%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-0.64%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.95%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-3.95%
Operating expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-3.50%
Total costs reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
2.43%
D&A change of 2.43% versus flat Packaging & Containers D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-3.83%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is -3.66%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-39.81%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-5.65%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -2.90%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2.13%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -2.13%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
769.05%
Other expenses growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-6.22%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -11.41%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2.72%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -8.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
161.90%
Tax expense change of 161.90% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-12.70%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -11.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-9.44%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -4.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-12.50%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -11.27%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-12.50%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -11.27%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.22%
Share count reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.22%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.