5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.49%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
2.52%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.63%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-7.01%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-6.55%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-1.76%
Operating expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -0.65%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.75%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.07%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
100.00%
Interest expense growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 4.19%. Jim Chanos would check leverage.
9.77%
D&A growth while Packaging & Containers reduces D&A. Peter Lynch would examine asset strategy.
7.00%
EBITDA growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-7.67%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -4.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.66%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.23%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
81.29%
Other expenses growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
8.86%
Pre-tax income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
9.40%
Pre-tax margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-11.42%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -10.16%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
10.43%
Net income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
10.98%
Net margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
10.00%
EPS change of 10.00% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
10.00%
Diluted EPS change of 10.00% versus flat Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.24%
Share count change of 0.24% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.