5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.85%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-0.18%
Cost reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -0.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-16.31%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-12.96%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.69%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -7.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-1.57%
Operating expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -1.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-0.44%
Total costs reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -0.67%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-33.33%
Interest expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-29.13%
D&A reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 1.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-22.22%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-47.26%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-89.49%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -7.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-89.07%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -4.98%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
155.00%
Other expenses growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-84.36%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -8.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-83.74%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -7.66%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-70.00%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -3.41%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-76.26%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -9.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-75.31%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -8.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-76.43%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -9.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-76.43%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -9.38%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.28%
Share count change of 0.28% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.28%
Diluted share change of 0.28% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.