5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.12%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-18.33%
Cost reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
202.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.65%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
209.22%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.31%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
346.88%
Other expenses change of 346.88% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
173.95%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 3.78%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-8.26%
Total costs reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 2.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
4.55%
Interest expense change of 4.55% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-10.33%
D&A reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
41.90%
EBITDA growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
46.86%
EBITDA margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
269.03%
Operating income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
277.01%
Operating margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
84.06%
Other expenses growth while Packaging & Containers reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
315.79%
Pre-tax income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
324.79%
Pre-tax margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
192.00%
Tax expense growth while Packaging & Containers reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
418.89%
Net income growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
425.79%
Net margin growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
414.96%
EPS growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
414.96%
Diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1.11%
Share count change of 1.11% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
1.11%
Diluted share change of 1.11% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.