5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.62%
Revenue decline while Packaging & Containers median is -1.69%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-9.33%
Cost reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -0.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-15.02%
Gross profit decline while Packaging & Containers median is -0.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-4.92%
Margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.92%
Other expenses change of 36.92% versus flat Packaging & Containers costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
36.92%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.86%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-2.10%
Total costs reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -0.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
16.05%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.58%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-49.82%
EBITDA decline while Packaging & Containers median is -5.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-43.86%
EBITDA margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -5.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-104.08%
Operating income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -10.71%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-104.56%
Operating margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -11.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-77.27%
Other expenses reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-114.18%
Pre-tax income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -9.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-115.86%
Pre-tax margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -8.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-143.84%
Tax expense reduction while Packaging & Containers median is -13.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-125.44%
Net income decline while Packaging & Containers median is -9.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-128.46%
Net margin decline while Packaging & Containers median is -13.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-125.00%
EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -8.55%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-125.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Packaging & Containers median is -8.56%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.75%
Share count change of 1.75% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
1.74%
Diluted share change of 1.74% versus stable Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss would verify approach.