PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.67%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.85%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-78.41%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.86%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-78.90%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-9.10%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.75%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.17%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-50.00%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-46.43%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
59.38%
Income change of 59.38% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
56.47%
Margin change of 56.47% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
23.81%
Other expenses change of 23.81% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
45.28%
Income change of 45.28% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
41.37%
Margin change of 41.37% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-33.33%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
44.07%
Income change of 44.07% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
40.07%
Margin change of 40.07% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
35.29%
EPS change of 35.29% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
35.29%
Diluted EPS change of 35.29% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-13.56%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-13.56%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.