PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.01%
Growth of 4.01% versus flat Consumer Cyclical revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
-10.02%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.38%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
103.08%
Growth of 103.08% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
95.25%
Margin change of 95.25% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.45%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-52.45%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-26.31%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Interest expense change of 33.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-32.56%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.19%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
116.00%
EBITDA change of 116.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
113.74%
Margin change of 113.74% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
98.14%
Income change of 98.14% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
98.21%
Margin change of 98.21% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
3.33%
Other expenses change of 3.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
92.17%
Income change of 92.17% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
92.48%
Margin change of 92.48% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
85.71%
Tax expense change of 85.71% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
92.82%
Income change of 92.82% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
93.10%
Margin change of 93.10% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
92.17%
EPS change of 92.17% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
92.17%
Diluted EPS change of 92.17% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-8.36%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-8.36%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.