PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.22%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.80%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-7.26%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
5.30%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
9.94%
Margin change of 9.94% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-116.18%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-116.18%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-34.24%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-81.88%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-3.45%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
575.00%
EBITDA change of 575.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
689.31%
Margin change of 689.31% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
4125.00%
Income change of 4125.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
4302.35%
Margin change of 4302.35% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
82.07%
Other expenses change of 82.07% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
983.33%
Income change of 983.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1022.25%
Margin change of 1022.25% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
733.33%
Tax expense change of 733.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
1033.33%
Income change of 1033.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1074.46%
Margin change of 1074.46% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
972.21%
EPS change of 972.21% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
972.21%
Diluted EPS change of 972.21% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
7.56%
Share count change of 7.56% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
7.56%
Diluted share change of 7.56% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.