PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.10%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.86%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
2.15%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.86%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-6.19%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-6.10%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.57%
Other expenses change of 1.57% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
1.57%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.70%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
2.01%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.92%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
49.37%
Interest expense change of 49.37% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
3.78%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.22%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-48.68%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.07%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.65%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-33.22%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-33.15%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-35.53%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.67%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-57.75%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-57.70%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.66%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-54.05%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.56%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-59.09%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-59.05%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-66.67%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-66.67%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
22.73%
Share count change of 22.73% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
22.73%
Diluted share change of 22.73% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.