PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.59%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
-16.43%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
179.92%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
167.63%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
136.25%
Other expenses change of 136.25% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
136.25%
Operating expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-1.35%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-14.29%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-1.91%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.15%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-1.71%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -5.65%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2.56%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
42.16%
Operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
35.92%
Operating margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-50.86%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
36.84%
Income change of 36.84% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
30.84%
Margin change of 30.84% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
109.84%
Tax expense change of 109.84% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-20.26%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-23.76%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-21.30%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-21.30%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.35%
Share count change of 1.35% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
1.35%
Diluted share change of 1.35% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.