5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.44%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-1.29%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.38%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-1.81%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.13%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-0.38%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.39%
Other expenses change of 8.39% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
8.39%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.86%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
1.00%
Total costs growth 50-90% of Consumer Cyclical median of 1.60%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine discipline.
-54.02%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-7.78%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-45.01%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.36%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-25.98%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-24.90%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
52.57%
Other expenses change of 52.57% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-8.08%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-6.74%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
491.67%
Tax expense change of 491.67% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-32.26%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-31.27%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-28.53%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-28.53%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-5.16%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-5.16%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.