PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.80%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
17.76%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.23%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-56.27%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-55.01%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.09%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-32.09%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
5.75%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.02%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-22.22%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
86.47%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.25%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
41.05%
EBITDA change of 41.05% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.01%
Margin change of 0.01% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-80.35%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-79.79%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
36.25%
Other expenses change of 36.25% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-93.87%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-93.69%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-184.91%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-70.67%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-69.83%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-69.81%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-69.81%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2.89%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-2.89%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.