PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.27%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
-14.71%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.73%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
145.19%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
132.93%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.88%
Other expenses change of 55.88% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
55.88%
Operating expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-3.79%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
14.29%
Interest expense change of 14.29% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-47.38%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
10.83%
EBITDA growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
5.28%
Margin change of 5.28% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
543.28%
Income change of 543.28% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
511.10%
Margin change of 511.10% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-113.73%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 16.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1912.50%
Income change of 1912.50% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1811.82%
Margin change of 1811.82% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
164.44%
Tax expense change of 164.44% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
380.33%
Income change of 380.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
356.30%
Margin change of 356.30% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
411.36%
EPS change of 411.36% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
411.36%
Diluted EPS change of 411.36% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-6.09%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-6.09%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.