5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.67%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-4.89%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-4.16%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
0.54%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.05%
Other expenses change of 5.05% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
5.05%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.25%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-2.72%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-21.69%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.06%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.37%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-9.05%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.75%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.77%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.12%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
22.83%
Other expenses change of 22.83% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-18.10%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.09%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
527.27%
Tax expense change of 527.27% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-51.01%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-48.60%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-46.67%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-46.67%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-8.14%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-8.14%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.