PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.11%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
15.64%
Cost growth of 15.64% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
-61.24%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-58.27%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.18%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-42.18%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
2.01%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.96%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-53.85%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-4.58%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-10.55%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-21.47%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-37.55%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-32.76%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
33.80%
Other expenses change of 33.80% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-38.11%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-33.36%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -4.73%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-85.99%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-1.12%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
6.45%
Margin change of 6.45% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-1.12%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1.12%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.