PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.76%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-24.59%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -4.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
127.85%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
141.76%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.52%
Other expenses change of 75.52% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
75.52%
Operating expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-11.21%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
116.67%
Interest expense change of 116.67% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-8.40%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.82%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-22.05%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
3.57%
Margin change of 3.57% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-4.11%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.75%
Margin change of 1.75% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-6.38%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.14%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-5.78%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.03%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
34.48%
Tax expense change of 34.48% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-9.81%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-4.30%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.50%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.50%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.92%
Share count change of 1.92% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
1.92%
Diluted share change of 1.92% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.