PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.14%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
13.54%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.93%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-51.16%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-49.06%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.21%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-63.21%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.47%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-5.46%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-21.31%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-40.00%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-24.04%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-4.92%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
44.74%
Income change of 44.74% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
50.98%
Margin change of 50.98% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-45.59%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
44.44%
Income change of 44.44% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
50.68%
Margin change of 50.68% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
233.33%
Tax expense change of 233.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
32.80%
Income change of 32.80% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
38.53%
Margin change of 38.53% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
32.80%
EPS change of 32.80% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
32.80%
Diluted EPS change of 32.80% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.