PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.68%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
11.09%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.14%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.93%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-9.01%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.23%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-3.23%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
7.41%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.45%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.25%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-9.29%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.60%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
3.76%
Income change of 3.76% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-2.74%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-24.53%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.00%
Income change of 1.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-5.32%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-7.02%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
2.34%
Income change of 2.34% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-4.07%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.00%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
13.71%
Share count change of 13.71% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
13.71%
Diluted share change of 13.71% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.