PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.36%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
10.71%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.52%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-7.00%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-11.73%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.70%
Other expenses change of 6.70% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
6.70%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.67%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
9.75%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.54%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
7.84%
Interest expense change of 7.84% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-1.58%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.37%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-19.91%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.80%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-22.32%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-26.27%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
27.50%
Other expenses change of 27.50% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-21.64%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-25.63%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-14.08%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-22.45%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-26.40%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-20.00%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-20.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3.06%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-3.06%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.