PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.35%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
2.53%
Cost increase while Consumer Cyclical shows cost reduction. Peter Lynch would examine competitive disadvantages.
16.80%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
9.82%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.16%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-3.16%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.41%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.28%
Total costs growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.33%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.71%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
39.41%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.75%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
51.83%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.91%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
19.63%
Operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
12.49%
Operating margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-114.23%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
21.68%
Income change of 21.68% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
14.41%
Margin change of 14.41% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
50.91%
Tax expense change of 50.91% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
18.73%
Net income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
11.63%
Margin change of 11.63% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
21.43%
EPS change of 21.43% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
21.43%
Diluted EPS change of 21.43% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-2.23%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-2.23%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.