PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.05%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-1.72%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.27%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-2.86%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-0.83%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.85%
Other expenses change of 17.85% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
17.85%
Operating expenses change of 17.85% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
2.41%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.93%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-13.98%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.83%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-24.85%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-35.47%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.31%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-34.11%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-12.50%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-38.29%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-37.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-32.53%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-39.09%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-37.82%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-41.18%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-41.18%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
3.54%
Share count change of 3.54% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
3.54%
Diluted share change of 3.54% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.