PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.21%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-3.46%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
1.22%
Growth of 1.22% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
3.51%
Margin expansion while Consumer Cyclical median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.25%
Other expenses change of 20.25% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
20.25%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.86%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
1.48%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.08%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.02%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.53%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
4.09%
EBITDA growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
6.44%
EBITDA margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-52.94%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-51.88%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
18.92%
Other expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-56.19%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -9.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-55.20%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -7.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-87.30%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-50.15%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -11.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-49.03%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -5.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-45.30%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -9.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-45.30%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -9.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-8.86%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-8.86%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.