PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.32%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -14.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-5.12%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -12.92%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
8.60%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
10.05%
Margin expansion while Consumer Cyclical median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.61%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-6.61%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -7.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-5.49%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -11.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.03%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
8.72%
EBITDA growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
10.17%
EBITDA margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
69.00%
Operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
71.26%
Operating margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-63.33%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
70.00%
Pre-tax income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
72.27%
Pre-tax margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
737.50%
Tax expense growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
36.42%
Net income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
38.24%
Net margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
20.00%
EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
13.68%
Share count change of 13.68% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
13.68%
Diluted share change of 13.68% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.