PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.40%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.73%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
2.08%
Cost growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 9.18%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive cost advantages.
-5.00%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 18.55%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-4.61%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.71%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.36%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-3.36%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
0.74%
Total costs growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 8.14%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate efficiency.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-14.94%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.12%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-3.29%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 32.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.96%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 19.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-6.02%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 46.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-5.64%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 36.53%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-69.23%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-9.08%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 45.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-8.71%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 38.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-8.26%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 33.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-9.09%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 45.95%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-8.72%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 38.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-13.33%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 47.83%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-13.33%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 48.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
4.90%
Share count change of 4.90% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
4.90%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.