PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.58%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.84%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
21.11%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.57%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.59%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-13.47%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.98%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-0.98%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
15.71%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.77%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.81%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-5.16%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
12.08%
Margin change of 12.08% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
26.46%
Income change of 26.46% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
12.33%
Margin change of 12.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-25.81%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
26.49%
Income change of 26.49% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
12.36%
Margin change of 12.36% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-4.79%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
29.09%
Income change of 29.09% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
14.67%
Margin change of 14.67% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-25.81%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-25.81%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.69%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.69%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.