PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.14%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.67%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-4.97%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-11.95%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-5.18%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.34%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-5.34%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-5.04%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.15%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-5.73%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.86%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-16.97%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-28.92%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-4.15%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
3.23%
Margin change of 3.23% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
23.08%
Other expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.74%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
-3.41%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
4.02%
Margin change of 4.02% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-20.86%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-2.59%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.65%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
4.91%
Net margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
-4.35%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-4.35%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.70%
Share count change of 0.70% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
1.84%
Diluted share change of 1.84% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.