PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.49%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
2.52%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.00%. Guy Spier would scrutinize cost control weaknesses.
-7.01%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-6.55%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.17%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-1.76%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.75%
Total costs growth 50-90% of Consumer Cyclical median of 1.98%. Mohnish Pabrai would examine discipline.
100.00%
Interest expense change of 100.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
9.77%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.76%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
7.00%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.73%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-7.67%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.66%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.19%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.23%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
81.29%
Other expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
8.86%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.14%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
9.40%
Margin change of 9.40% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-11.42%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
10.43%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.69%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
10.98%
Margin change of 10.98% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
10.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.41%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.38%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
0.24%
Share count change of 0.24% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.