5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.34%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
1.18%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.32%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-27.70%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-21.97%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.76%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-10.76%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-0.87%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.96%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-16.67%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-29.24%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-42.25%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-36.76%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -4.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-44.39%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-39.98%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-29.00%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-38.71%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -7.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-33.86%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -6.72%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-80.41%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-35.91%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.95%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-30.84%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.74%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-36.36%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-36.36%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.74%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.28%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.43%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.