PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.62%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.38%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-14.55%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -4.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
6.88%
Positive growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
18.26%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.47%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.31%
Other expenses change of 3.31% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
3.31%
Operating expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-11.79%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
49.70%
D&A growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces D&A. Peter Lynch would examine asset strategy.
-12.48%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
34.29%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 8.04%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
12.52%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.80%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
24.50%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.29%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-101.75%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 29.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-6.10%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 20.41%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
3.89%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 17.38%. Jim Chanos would check for deterioration.
223.68%
Tax expense growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 11.38%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
-9.83%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 15.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.23%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.15%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-9.52%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-9.52%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.08%
Share count change of 0.08% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.