PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.10%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-2.46%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-23.17%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-16.40%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.88%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1.95%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.61%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-1.66%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.60%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.13%. Guy Spier would scrutinize investment needs.
-62.69%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 4.72%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-36.53%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.93%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-51.00%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-46.68%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-185.71%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-68.64%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-65.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-59.35%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-70.84%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.38%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-68.27%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-70.53%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.68%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-70.53%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.28%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.