PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.62%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-9.33%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-15.02%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-4.92%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.92%
Other expenses change of 36.92% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
36.92%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.20%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-2.10%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.04%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
16.05%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.29%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-49.82%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-43.86%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -4.07%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-104.08%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-104.56%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-77.27%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-114.18%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -10.19%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-115.86%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -10.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-143.84%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -4.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-125.44%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -5.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-128.46%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -6.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-125.00%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -5.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-125.00%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -5.71%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.75%
Share count change of 1.75% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
1.74%
Diluted share change of 1.74% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.